Personal Injury and Wrongful Death

FDA Warning Letter to Matrixx Intitiatives, Inc.

WE ARE NO LONGER TAKING THESE CASES.

PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT US ABOUT THE ZICAM RECALL.

As a public service, Pritzker Olsen law firm is providing the text of the FDA warning letter to Matrixx Initiatives, Inc., aka Zicam LLC, regarding Zicam Cold Remedy Nasal Gel, Zicam Cold Remedy Gel Swabs, and Zicam Cold Remedy Swabs, Kids Size.

Our Minnesota personal injury law firm is representing Zicam smell loss victims nationwide. Contact our law firm to discuss a Zicam lawsuit with a personal injury lawyer MN.

The following is the FDA warning letter that prompted Matrixx Initiatives to initiate a Zicam recall:

WARNING LETTER

June 16, 2009

William J. Hemelt, Acting President, CFO and COO
Matrixx Initiatives, Inc
8515 East Anderson Drive
Scottsdale, AZ  85255                        

Dear Mr. Hemelt:

This letter concerns your firm’s marketing of the products Zicam Cold Remedy Nasal Gel, Zicam Cold Remedy Gel Swabs, and Zicam Cold Remedy Swabs, Kids Size.

FDA has concluded that these products may pose a serious risk to consumers who use them.  Specifically, FDA has received more than 130 reports of anosmia, (loss of sense of smell, which in some cases can be long-lasting or permanent), associated with use of these products. [Note: later in the letter, the FDA states that Matrixx Initiatives has had more than 800 reports of smell loss from Zicam users.]

To protect consumers, and in light of the violations described below, we ask that within fifteen working days of receipt of this letter, you notify this office in writing of the specific steps that you have taken to correct the violations.

These products are available without a prescription, and they contain zinc gluconate (identified as zincum gluconicum on their labels) as their active ingredient.  All are administered by direct application to the nasal cavity and, as described in the labeling, are intended for use in “adults and children 3 years of age and older (with adult supervision).”   These products are referred to hereafter as the “Zicam Cold Remedy intranasal products.”

According to the labeling accompanying the Zicam Cold Remedy intranasal products, each of these products “reduces” the “duration of the common cold” and the “severity of cold symptoms,” including specifically “sore throat • stuffy nose •sneezing • coughing • congestion.”   These claims make these products drugs, as defined by section 201(g)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act), 21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1), because they are intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease or to affect the structure or function of the body of man or other animals. 

We are not aware of any data establishing that the Zicam Cold Remedy intranasal products are generally recognized as safe and effective for the uses identified in their labeling.[1]   On the contrary, as described below, there is evidence that these products pose a serious safety risk to consumers.  Because they are not generally recognized as safe and effective for their labeled uses, these products are new drugs, as defined by section 201(p) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321(p). 

Under sections 301(d) and 505(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(d) and 355(a), a new drug may not be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce unless an FDA‑approved application is in effect for it.  There are no approved new drug applications (NDAs) on file with FDA for any of the Zicam Cold Remedy intranasal products; you market them without FDA approval. 

We recognize that the labeling for Zicam Cold Remedy intranasal products identifies them as homeopathic drug products with an active ingredient measured in homeopathic strength—Zincum Gluconicum 2X.  Nothing in the Act or the regulations issued under it exempts homeopathic drugs from the new drug approval requirements.  We acknowledge that many homeopathic drug products are manufactured and distributed without FDA approval under enforcement policies set out in the FDA’s Compliance Policy Guide entitled, “Conditions Under Which Homeopathic Drugs May be Marketed (CPG 7132.15)” (the CPG).  The enforcement discretion set forth in the CPG is not unlimited, however.  The CPG states that it “delineates those conditions under which homeopathic drugs may ordinarily be marketed in the U.S.” (emphasis added)  The qualifying word “ordinarily” indicates that the CPG specifically contemplates that there may be circumstances where a product that otherwise may meet the conditions set forth in the CPG may nevertheless be subject to enforcement action.

A significant and growing body of evidence substantiates that the Zicam Cold Remedy intranasal products may pose a serious risk to consumers who use them.  Specifically, FDA has received more than 130 reports of anosmia (loss of sense of smell, which in some cases can be long-lasting or permanent),associated with use of these products; some individuals also report loss of sense of taste.[2]   By comparison,  FDA has received few reports of anosmia associated with other widely-used intranasal products for treatment of the common cold that are marketed subject to approved NDAs or according to an OTC drug monograph.  Further, there is evidence in the published scientific literature that various salts of zinc can damage olfactory function in animals and humans

A homeopathic drug product marketed without an approved NDA is not subject to the enforcement discretion set forth in the CPG when there is evidence of a safety risk associated with the product, as is the case for the Zicam Cold Remedy intranasal products.  Under these circumstances, the Agency enforces the Act’s new drug approval requirement, a provision that is essential to protect the public health by holding firms responsible for demonstrating, based on adequate and well-controlled clinical investigations, that a product is safe and effective for each of its intended uses before marketing it.  Therefore, an approved NDA is required for the Zicam Cold Remedy intranasal products, regardless of their homeopathic status.  Your introduction of the Zicam Cold Remedy intranasal products into interstate commerce, without an approved application, violates sections 301(d) and 505(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(d) and 355(a).

Additionally, Zicam Cold Remedy intranasal products are misbranded under section 502(f)(2) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 352(f)(2), because their labeling does not bear adequate warnings regarding the risk of anosmia associated with the product.  In light of this failure to bear adequate warnings, these products are also misbranded under section 502(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 352(a), taking into account the considerations set forth in section 201(n) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321(n).

The issues and violations cited in this letter are not intended to be an all-inclusive statement of violations that exist in connection with your products.  You are responsible for investigating and determining the causes of the violations identified above and for preventing their recurrence or the occurrence of other violations. It is your responsibility to assure that your firm complies with all requirements of federal law and FDA regulations. . . .

You should take prompt action to correct the violations cited in this letter.  Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in legal action without further notice, including, without limitation, seizure and injunction.  Other federal agencies may take this Warning Letter into account when considering the award of contracts.

Within fifteen working days of receipt of this letter, please notify this office in writing of the specific steps that you have taken to correct violations.  Include an explanation of each step being taken to prevent the recurrence of violations, as well as copies of related documentation.    If you cannot complete corrective action within fifteen working days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which you will complete the corrections.  Furthermore, please advise this office what actions you will take to address product that you have already distributed.

In addition to the reports FDA has received directly from consumers, the agency is aware that Matrixx appears to have more than 800 reports related to loss of sense of smell associatedwith Zicam Cold Remedy intranasal products.  [Note: the FDA suspects the number of reported cases of anosmia to Matrixx may be higher and asked for " all reports you have related to loss of sense of smell associated with Zicam Cold Remedy intranasal products."

Additionally, if another firm or firms manufacture the products identified above, your reply should include the name and address of all such firms.  If the firm from which you receive the products is not the manufacturer, please include the name of your supplier in addition to the manufacturer. . . .                                                                     


[Footnotes]

[1] Under the Agency’s OTC drug review, FDA has adopted a final monograph that establishes conditions under which OTC cold, cough, allergy, bronchodilator, and anti-asthmatic drug products, in forms suitable for oral, inhalant, or topical administration, are generally recognized as safe and effective.  21 CFR  Part 341 ( the OTC Cold Cough monograph).  This final monograph covers products intended to treat the same conditions for which Zicam is labeled (i.e., treatment of the common cold and cold symptoms).  Although homeopathic drugs are excluded from the OTC drug review (37 F.R. 9464, 9466 (May 11, 1972)), we note that the OTC Cold Cough monograph does not include any products in any dosage form containing zinc or any salt of zinc as their active ingredient.

[2] We note that loss of sense of smell can have serious consequences.  For example, patients with anosmia may not be able to detect the smell of a gas leak, smoke, or spoiled food.  Loss of sense of taste can have a major impact on an individual's quality of life. 

 


Free Case Consultation





Logos

We are Not Paid Unless You Win

Our attorneys work on a continguency fee basis, meaning you do not have to pay our law firm for representing you unless we win you money.

 

Firm News

AV Preeminent Rating by Martindale-Hubbell

AV Rated Personal Injury Attorney

Attorneys Fred Pritzker and Eric Hageman have been given the highest rating by Martindale-Hubbell for attorney, AV Preeminent. An AV® certification mark is a significant rating accomplishment - a testament to the fact that a lawyer's peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence.

 

Adjunct Teaching Position At U of M Law School

University LogoAttorney Brendan Flaherty has accepted an adjunct teaching position at the University of Minnesota Law School. For the 2011 spring semester, Flaherty will teach a course entitled "Practice and Professionalism," which will introduce students to foundational lawyering skills and professional responsibility issues.

 

Attorney Elliot Olsen Speaks at Conference

Attorney Elliot Olsen recently spoke at the Seventh Annual LifeScience Alley Conference in Minneapolis on Preemption and the Future of Medical Device Litigation.  He appeared with Randall Pattee of Lindquist and Vennum and Jean Lance, VP of corporate legal and general counsel for Boston Scientific. 

 

Named Super Lawyer

Super LawyerIn recognition of their achievements, Attorneys Fred Pritzker, Elliot Olsen and Eric Hageman were named "Super Lawyers" by Law & Politics magazine. According to Super Lawyers, "The objective is to create a credible, comprehensive and diverse listing of outstanding attorneys that can be used as a resource to assist attorneys and consumers in the search for legal counsel."

 

Brendan Flaherty Named a Rising Star

In recognition of his achievements, Attorney Brendan Flaherty was named a 2010 Rising Star by Minnesota Law & Politics. Only 2.5 percent of the state’s lawyers are included on the list, which highlights Minnesota’s best up-and-coming legal talent.

 

Fred Pritzker Listed in The Best Lawyers in America

Fred Pritzker has been notified that he will again be listed in The Best Lawyers in America for his work in personal injury litigation.

 

This is attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The result of each case is determined by the specific facts and the applicable law.