MEDTRONIC DEFIBRILLATOR LEAD RECALL: MEDTRONIC RECALL INFORMATION

Pritzker | Olsen, P.A. is representing clients injured by defective Medtronic defibrillator leads. Two of our clients were shocked over twenty times before medical professionals were able to turn off the defibrillator.

Contact a lawyer about a Medtronic defibrillator lead lawsuit >>

We are also representing the family of a man who died as a result of getting his Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead removed. A young man, he left behind two young sons. We are fighting to obtain compensation for the family via product liability and medical malpractice claims. Read about heart lead extraction surgery malpractice.

DO YOU HAVE A MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CLAIM FOR NEGLIGENT REMOVAL OF A MEDTRONIC DEFIBRILLATOR LEAD?

Contact a lawyer about a medical malpractice lawsuit after injury or death from Medtronic lead removal (extraction) surgery >>

Medtronic Recall

Medtronic lead Shock Medtronic has removed its Sprint Fidelis defibrillator leads from the market because they may fracture, which can cause the defibrillator to deliver unnecessary shocks or not operate at all. This is considered a Medtronic recall. Some deaths, at least 13, and major complications have occurred after the leads have fractured (Medtronic is reporting 13 deaths, but at least 46 deaths have been alleged to be associated with a Medtronic Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead.)

A defibrillator lead connects the defibrillator, which is implanted near the shoulder, to the heart. If a lead fractures, it may send false signals to the defibrillator, causing the defibrillator to deliver unnecessary shocks or, in some cases, not to pace or shock when needed. Our clients have explained that the shocks are quite painful and that the fear of experiencing additional shocks is intense.

More than 268,000 recalled Medtronic leads were used with various defibrillators. Patients should consult their doctors regarding their defibrillator leads, and if a Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead is involved, they should discuss what course of action to take. If you opt to have a recalled Medtronic defibrillator lead removed, contact a Medtronic lawyer at Pritzker | Olsen, P.A. about a Medtronic lawsuit.

The FDA has provided the following explanation of the defect and recommendations regarding the Sprint Fidelis defibrillator leads:

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillators (CRT-Ds) are used to treat abnormal heart rhythms that can cause the heart to stop suddenly. ICDs and CRT-Ds shock the heart back into normal rhythm by sending a pulse of energy through an electronic wire or lead that is connected to the heart.

When a defibrillator lead is slightly more prone to fracture, it doesn't mean that every lead will break. Most leads will function well, as is the case with Sprint Fidelis. In the infrequent circumstance where a lead actually breaks, or "fractures," the lead may send false signals that cause inappropriate defibrillator shocks, or therapies such as pacing or shocks may not be delivered.

Current adverse event information indicates that fractures have occurred in less than 1 percent of the approximately 268,000 of these leads implanted worldwide. We don't know if this rate of adverse events will remain constant or increase over the life of these leads.

FDA considers Medtronic's action to be a product recall, as defined by FDA regulations, and we will soon be issuing a recall classification for this action. We recognize that some patients and health care professionals might inappropriately interpret the word "recall" to mean that the devices must be surgically removed and returned to the manufacturer. Although the leads should no longer be implanted in patients, we do not mean to imply that these leads should be surgically removed.

The leads continue to function properly in the vast proportion of patients. Although there is no test to predict which lead will fracture, FDA agrees with Medtronic's recommendation that defibrillator settings be adjusted at the patient's next scheduled follow-up visit with their doctor. Doing so may increase the likelihood that a fracture will be detected before a patient is harmed.

Neither FDA, Medtronic, nor representatives of the Heart Rhythm Society, recommend the routine surgical removal of a fractured lead because removal carries risks. Instead, physicians should weigh the benefits and risks of either continuing to use the lead with careful monitoring or capping the lead so it is no longer useable and implanting a different model.

Patients should recognize that a small number of Sprint Fidelis leads are used with defibrillators made by manufacturers other than Medtronic. If patients have reason to believe that they have a Sprint Fidelis lead or if they do not know the model of their lead, they should contact their health care professional.

FDA will continue to monitor information on these devices and will take whatever other actions may be necessary.

If you are interested in being represented in a Medtronic lawsuit, please contact Pritzker | Olsen, P.A.. Our law firm has a national reputation, and attorneys at the firm have appeared on CBS News, Fox News and numerous local television stations. Attorneys at the firm also have been quoted by The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Lawyers USA and other publications. In recognition of their achievements, Fred Pritzker, Elliot Olsen and Eric Hageman have been selected as “Super Lawyers” by Law & Politics magazine. To contact the firm, please call toll-free at 1-888-377-8900 or submit the firm’s free case consultation form.

Medtronic Defibrillator Lead Recall - Medtronic Recall - Medtronic ICD Lead Recall - Sprint Fidelis Lead Recall

Free Case Consultation

Firm News

Fred Pritzker Listed in The Best Lawyers in America

Fred Pritzker has been notified that he will again be listed in The Best Lawyers in America for his work in personal injury litigation.

Attorney Elliot Olsen Speaks at Conference

Attorney Elliot Olsen recently spoke at the Seventh Annual LifeScience Alley Conference in Minneapolis on Preemption and the Future of Medical Device Litigation. He appeared with Randall Pattee of Lindquist and Vennum and Jean Lance, VP of corporate legal and general counsel for Boston Scientific.

Zicam Lawsuit

Several lawsuits have been filed alleging Zicam caused loss of smell (anosmia) and taste, and our lawyers are reviewing potential claims. We are gathering information about Zicam smell loss. Read more about Zicam: Zicam class action lawsuit, warning letter from the FDA to Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. regarding Zicam Cold Remedy nasal spray and gel swabs, Zicam recall.

After only one use of a Zicam Cold Remedy product, Bonnie Blodgett lost her sense of smell. A gradening writer and foodie, her life was drastically changed. She recently published Remembering Smell: A Memoir of Losing--and Discovering--the Primal Sense in which she chronicals her experience with losing her sense of smell and then slowly getting it back again.

Bonnie's experience with Zicam is similar to many of our other clients. They experienced a burning sensation during the first use of a Zicam product and then lost their sense of smell (anosmia). Most of them were not as fortunate as Bonnie and have not regained their sense of smell.

For more information about Remembering Smell, please click on the image of the book.

Ortho Evra Lawsuit: Ortho Evra Birth Control Patch

The Ortho Evra birth control patch has been linked to an increased risk of blood clots that can lead to pulmonary embolism, stroke and heart attack.

Fentanyl Lawsuit and Fentanyl Recall

There have been a number of recalls regarding fentanyl due to the risk of a fentanyl overdose.

This is attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The result of each case is determined by the specific facts and the applicable law.