Practice Areas
Foodborne Illness
- E coli Poisoning
- E coli O157
- E coli O26
- E. coli Death - E. coli Wrongful Death
- E. coli HUS
- E. coli Kidney Failure
- Hemorrhagic Colitis
- E. coli Lawsuit CDC
- E. coli Meningitis
- E. coli Prevention
- E. coli Recalls
- E. coli Risks
- Ecoli Symptoms
- E. coli Treatment
- E. coli Links
- E. coli Lawyer
- E. coli Wrongful Death Settlement
- E. coli O111
- E. coli O145
- Restaurant E. coli
- Water E coli Lawsuit
- Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
- Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP)
- Outbreak Information
- Food Poisoning Lawyer
- Food Recalls
- Food Safety
- Food Safety Law Blog
- Food Poisoning Law Blog
- E. coli Lawyer
Other Practice Areas
- Amputation
- Burn Attorney
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Wrongful Death
- Car Accident Attorney
- Defective Products
- Medical Malpractice
- Medical Products
- Accident Attorney
- Dog Bite Attorney
- Injury Lawyer
- Semi Truck Accident Lawyer
- Child Safety Lawyers
Pritzker Olsen Attorneys
E. coli O111:
Lawyer and Pathogen Information
Have you been sickened in an E. coli O111 outbreak? Do you want to be compensated for medical expenses, pain and suffering and other damages?
Contact our law firm for a free E. coli O111 case review >>
E. coli O111 Outbreak Information
Three are sick with E. coli O111 and eight more could be part of the same outbreak at Four Mile prison in Canon City, Colorado, local news sources reported Saturday, April 24. The outbreak was discovered Thursday, according to news reports. The three sick inmates were treated at the prison’s infirmary. Read more about the Four Mile Prison E. coli outbreak in Colorado.
Our food safety lawyers have been interviewed by The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Lawyers USA and others. Attorneys Fred Pritzker, Elliot Olsen and Eric Hageman have been named "Super Lawyers" by Law & Politics magazine (Aug. 2009). To contact our law firm about an E. coli O111 lawsuit, please call 1-888-377-8900 (toll-free) or email attorney Fred Pritzker.
E. coli O111 Pathogen Information
According to the CDC, health officials have linked eleven E. coli outbreaks since 1990 to E. coli O111. E. coli O111 is a Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC). STEC cause illness in otherwise healthy persons, including severe abdominal cramping (sometimes confused for appendicitis), bloody diarrhea, and HUS.
Most STEC-associated illnesses are caused by E. coli O157:H7. STET cause an estimated 110,000 illnesses each year in the United States, of which about 30% may be attributable to non-O157 serotypes such as E. coli 0111. E. coli O111 is one of the most common non-O157 STEC (after E. coli O26) isolated from specimens submitted to CDC for serotyping.
In August of 2008, the CDC and Oklahoma health officials identified 313 people who contracted E. coli O111 infections after eating at Country Cottage, a Locust Grove, Oklahoma restaurant. One person died in the outbreak and 17 people had to be put on dialysis because they had developed E. coli-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Read more about this outbreak and a Country Cottage lawsuit.
- Call 1-888-377-8900 (toll-free)
- Email our lawyers
- Submit our online consultation form, which will be reviewed by one of our experienced lawyers.
E. coli O111 Lawsuit
If you are a victim of an E. coli 0111 outbreak, a restaurant, food manufacturer, food distributor or other party needs to be liable (legally responsible for your illness) for you to be compensated for your medical expenses, pain and suffering, loss of income and other damages. Generally, this means that the source or location of the E. coli O111 infections (food, water, etc.) must be epidemiologically implicated and/or microbiologically confirmed.
For example, if the health officials determine that all or most of the people who contracted E. coli O111 infections became ill after eating at the same restaurant, that epidemiologically implicates the restaurant as the location where the infections were transmitted. The restaurant would then be liable.
In E. coli litigation cases, strict liability usually applies. This means that E. coli victims only need to prove the following: 1) that the food was contaminated with E. coli and 2) that the contaminated food caused the injuries, the E. coli infection and any illnesses related thereto, for example, hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), a leading cause of kidney failure. It is not necessary to prove that anyone intentionally or negligently contaminated the food.
Applying the strict liability standard to the case of the restaurant described above, the restaurant would be liable even if the restaurant was not negligent and did not intentionally contaminate food or water.
One of the other issues in these cases is the liable party's ability to compensate victims. Looking again at the restaurant case, if the restaurant is owned by a national chain, there will most likely be adequate insurance to cover the victims' claims. However, if the restaurant is a mom-and-pop operation, the insurance proceeds will probably not be adequate to compensate all victims. This is why it is important to find the actual food that sickened the victims. This gives victims another party to sue, i.e., another party to seek compensation from.
If you or a family member has been diagnosed with E. coli O111, E. coli O157 or any other STEC, contact a lawyer Pritzker | Olsen, P.A. for a free consultation.
- Call 1-888-377-8900 (toll-free)
- Email our lawyers
- Submit our online consultation form, which will be reviewed by one of our experienced lawyers.
Free Case Consultation
Food Poisoning News
Fred Pritzker Listed in The Best Lawyers in America
Fred Pritzker has been notified that he will again be listed in The Best Lawyers in America.
Non-O157 E. coli (Non-O157 STEC)
Non-O157 E. coli can cause serious injury and death, and yet ground beef contaminated with these strains of E. coli are not considered adulterated under federal law. The six most common strains of non-O157 E. coli include E. coli O26, E. coli O45, E. coli O103, E. coli O111, E. coli O121 and E. coli O145.
Steak E. coli Outbreak
Our E. coli lawyers are investigating cases of E. coli O157 that have been linked to steak served at restaurants in California, Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah and Washington.
Fairbank Farms Beef Recall Lawsuit
Fairbank Farms ground beef products have been associated with E. coli cases in California, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and Vermont.
Petting Zoo Llama E. coli HUS
Our law firm has been retained to represent a 3-year-old child who contracted an E. coli infection after visiting an apple orchard/petting zoo in Minnesota. The child developed hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS).
E. coli Wrongful Death Settlement
We have recently settled a number of E. coli cases involving victims of various E. coli outbreaks, including a wrongful death claim.
Recent Foodborne Outbreaks
- Taco John's Lawsuit: Taco Johns food poisoning lawsuit information.
- Taco Bell Lawsuit: Information about a Taco Bell food poisoning lawsuit.
- Chipotle Lawsuit: Update on Chipotle food poisoning case and Chipotle lawsuit FAQ.
- Subway Salmonellosis Lawsuit: 34 people were sickened, and 14 of those were hospitalized, all in Illinios.
- Hartmann Dairy E coli Lawsuit Lawyer - 5 people, 4 of them children, contracted E. coli, and one of those developed HUS.
- Freshway Foods lettuce lawsuit - We are representing one of the people who developed hemolytic uremic syndrome.
- Pasture Maid Creamery Campylobacter: Our lawyers are representing a man who was paralyzed with Guillain-Barre syndrome.
- Peppa's E. coli Lawsuit - An E. coli outbreak in Hawaii associated with the restaurant.
- Daniele Salami Lawsuit: Daniele salami (salame) has been linked to a Salmonella Montevideo outbreak.
- Steak E. coli Outbreak: Over 20 people were sickened by blade-tenderized, non-intact steak.
- Fairbank Farms Lawsuit: A multistate E. coli outbreak has been linked to Fairbank Farms hamburger.
This is attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The result of each case is determined by the specific facts and the applicable law.



