Practice Areas
- E coli Poisoning
- E coli O157
- E. coli Lawsuit
- E. coli HUS
- E. coli TTP
- Hemorrhagic Colitis
- E coli Colectomy
- Hemolytic Anemia
- E. coli Wrongful Death
- E. coli Kidney Failure
- E. coli Outbreak Attorneys
- E. coli Lawsuits CDC
- Shiga Toxin E. coli
- E. coli Prevention
- E. coli Recalls
- E. coli Risks
- Ecoli Symptoms
- E. coli Treatment
- E. coli Links
- E. coli Lawyer
- E. coli Attorney
- E. coli O45
- E. coli O111
- E. coli O145
- E coli O26
- Restaurant E. coli
- Water E coli Lawsuit
- Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS)
- HUS E. coli O157: H7
- TTP HUS
- HUS Coma
- HUS Seizures
- Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS) and Future Medical Expenses
- Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Prevention
- Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Symptoms
- Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Risks
- Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Treatment
- Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Links
- HUS Syndrome
- Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP)
- Outbreak Information
- PFGE E. coli Testing
- E. coli Wrongful Death Settlement
- Ethics and E. coli Lawyers
- Fred Pritzker Calls for Food Safety Laws (Blog)
- Fred Pritzker on E. coli Litigation (Blog)
- Food Poisoning and Medical Treatment
- How to Hire an E. coli Lawyer
- Kroger E. coi Lawsuit
- Food Poisoning Lawyer
- Food Recalls
- Food Safety
- Food Safety Law Blog
- Food Poisoning Law Blog
- E. coli Lawyer
- Foodborne Illness
Other Practice Areas
- Amputation
- Burn Attorney
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Wrongful Death
- Car Accident Attorney
- Defective Products
- Medical Malpractice
- Medical Products
- Accident Attorney
- Dog Bite Attorney
- Injury Lawyer
- Semi Truck Accident Lawyer
- Child Safety Lawyers
Personal Injury and Wrongful Death
E. coli Lawsuits
Pritzker Olsen law firm has recovered millions for E. coli poisoning victims. We have successfully represented people who developed E. coli-HUS.
Contact our E. coli attorneys for a free consultation >>>
For additional E. coli lawsuits information, watch our
E. coli lawsuit video.
E. coli Lawsuits Invoving
State Health Department
and/or CDC Confirmation
For E. coli lawsuit purposes, it is valuable to have a state health department and/or the CDC determine that a person with an E. coli infection is part of a foodborne outbreak. This can be used as evidence in court that:
- The person with the E. coli infection was a victim of the foodborne outbreak
- The restaurant, food processor and/or other party linked to the outbreak is liable for the victim’s damages
Victims of E. coli outbreaks should consult an experienced E. coli lawsuit lawyer regarding an E. coli lawsuit's strength and the amount of damages that should be sought.
E. coli Lawsuits:
Microbiological and Epidemiological Evidence
To determine who is part of an E. coli outbreak and the source of an outbreak, health officials use both microbiology and epidemiology. The microbiological and epidemiological evidence gathered by a health department or the CDC can be used in an E. coli lawsuit against the parties responsible for the contamination of the food product and the sale and distributio of the contaminated product.
The microbiology is a series of tests on samples of E. coli taken from the stools of people sickened and suspected food and other environmental samples.
Initial tests determine if the bacteria is E. coli O157:H7. If so, additional tests are done to determine the DNA fingerprints of all of the E. coli samples. If the E. coli from two or more people has the same DNA fingerprint, there is an E. coli outbreak. Everyone whose E. coli matches that DNA fingerprint is part of the outbreak. If E. coli found in food or an environmental sample matches the DNA fingerprint, that is evidence of the source of the outbreak.
Bacteria with the same “DNA fingerprint” are likely to come from the same source.
The epidemiology used involves primarily interviews with ill people and their families. Health officials ask where the sick person has been, what he or she ate and other questions that will point to a source of the outbreak.
Timeline for Determining Victims of an E. coli Outbreak
A series of events occurs between the time a patient is infected and the time public health officials can determine that the patient is part of an outbreak. This means that there will be a delay between the start of illness and confirmation that a patient is part of an outbreak.
The timeline is as follows:
- Incubation time: The time from eating the contaminated food to the beginning of symptoms. For E. coli O157, this is typically 3-4 days.
- Time to treatment: The time from the first symptom until the person seeks medical care, when a diarrhea sample is collected for laboratory testing. This time lag may be 1-5 days.
- Time to diagnosis: The time from when a person gives a sample to when E. coli O157 is obtained from it in a laboratory. This may be 1-3 days from the time the sample is received in the laboratory. [If you go to the doctor with E. coli symptoms, you will need to ask the doctor to test your stool sample for E. coli. You should also discuss the need for a separate test to discover the genetic fingerprint of any E. coli found in your stool. Contact E. coli lawsuit attorneys at Pritzker | Olsen, P.A. for more information.]
- Sample shipping time: The time required to ship the E. coli O157 bacteria from the laboratory to the state public health authorities that will perform “DNA fingerprinting”. This may take 0-7 days depending on transportation arrangements within a state and the distance between the clinical laboratory and public health department.
- Time to “DNA fingerprinting”: The time required for the state public health authorities to perform “DNA fingerprinting” on the E. coli O157 and compare it with the outbreak pattern. Ideally this can be accomplished in 1 day. However, many public health laboratories have limited staff and space, and experience multiple emergencies at the same time. Thus, the process may take 1-4 days.
The time from the beginning of the patient’s illness to the confirmation that he or she was part of an outbreak is typically about 2-3 weeks. Case counts in the midst of an outbreak investigation must be interpreted within this context.
Free Consultation about an E. coli Lawsuit
If you have been diagnosed with E. coli and are or may be a victim of a foodborne outbreak, contact an E. coli lawyer at PritzkerOlsen, P.A. for a free consultation regarding your legal rights and remedies. You may be entitled to compensation for medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, emotional distress and other damages.
Our E. coli lawyers have been interviewed by CBS, CNN, FOX, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Lawyers USA and others. Attorney Fred Pritzker is listed in the current edition of The Best Lawyers in America. To contact Pritzker Olsen law firm, call toll-free at 1-888-377-8900 or use the firm's online-consultation form.
States: Arizona California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, MassachusettsMichigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Free Case Consultation
Fred Pritzker on Twitter
- RT @FPBulletin: #Diamond Pet Foods #recall expands again. http://t.co/EcBuFbfy #Salmonella
- RT @FPBulletin: #USDA launches web based #labeling system for meat, poultry, eggs. http://t.co/XOUhMKKY
- Excellent editorial in St Cloud Times. This #rawmilk "battle" is more about convenience than food freedom. http://t.co/bApXAxqh
- Iowa school district served students lettuce recalled for #Listeria.http://bit.ly/Ke4PgH
- Iowa School District Served Students Lettuce Recalled For Listeria http://t.co/UbPo9xQK
- Dog food recall associated with human #Salmonella outbreak expands. ttp://bit.ly/Lymgwz
- More Dog Food Linked To Salmonella Outbreak In Humans Is Recalled http://t.co/k4hpWaIU
- SC recalls 7000 lbs of ground beef after #Ecoli turns up in tests. http://t.co/amEGWMK2
Fred Pritzker is listed in The Best Lawyers in America
This is attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The result of each case is determined by the specific facts and the applicable law.


