Food Poisoning Law Firm
Pritzker Olsen Law Firm Food Safety Blog

Pritzker Olsen attorneys have appeared on CBS News, Fox news, and numerous local television stations throughout the country. They have recovered millions for victims of food poisoning outbreaks. To contact our law firm, please call 1-888-377-8900 (toll free) or submit our free consultation form.

Patrons Sickened While at Restaurant

A paramedic unit sent to a restaurant in Raleigh, North Carolina, called for backup once the crew realized there were too many sick people to handle.

According to a story in the Independent Weekly newspaper, nine rescuers ultimately attended to victims. Now the Wake County Environmental Health and Safety Division is investigating -- but the division's director isn't saying yet which restaurant is involved.

"We don't have any results yet,'' Andre Pearce told the weekly.
But the newspaper checked with the Raleigh-Wake 911 Center and found that an emergency call came shortly before 10 p.m. Friday for paramedics to help someone at Evoo, a Mediterranean style restaurant in Raleigh's Five Points.

The newspaper said some of the ill restaurant patrons were taken to the hospital.

National food safety law firm PritzkerOlsen, P.A., is waiting for the results of the investigation to determine what happened. The firm is involved in virtually every major foodborne illness outbreak and has collected large sums on behalf of people injured or killed by adulterated food.

To contact a food poisoning lawyer at PritzkerOlsen, call 1-800-888-377-8900 (toll free) or complete a free online case consultation form.

Labels: , ,


Cleaning Up An "Off Taste"

Yogurt customers of Stonyfield Farm were complaining about an "off taste'' in quarts of fat free plain yogurt.

When company officials looked into it, they discovered that the offensive ingredient was a cleaning product.

What followed Saturday was a Stonyfield Farm food safety recall of 44,000 quarts of the dairy item.

The company, based in Londonderry, New Hampshire, described the cleaning product as a "food grade sanitizer'' and said no one reported getting sick from the adulteration.

The recall announcement was publicized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

"The issue was a result of human error in not following our Company’s standard operating procedures,'' the press release said. "Stonyfield has taken all the necessary corrective action to prevent this from occurring again.''

The 32-ounce containers involved in the recall have one of two product codes printed along the cup bottom that start with the following date codes: May 06 09; time stamped 22:17 through 23:59 and May 07 09; all time stamps.

Labels: ,


Food Safety: Attorney Calls for Responsible Reaction to Recalls

The recent Salmonella outbreak linked to Peanut Corporation of America peanut butter and peanut paste resulted in recalls of thousands of products (3,863 as of March 27, 2009).

In the following opinion piece, food safety attorney Fred Pritzker discusses the responsibility of retailers and others to get recalled products off of the shelves. According to Mr. Pritzker, "To promote food safety, everyone up and down the stream of commerce has to act and bear responsibility and should be held accountable for failing to do so."

Upstream, Downstream: Everyone Has to be Responsible

by Fred Pritzker

The whole point of a food recall is to prevent additional foodborne illness after producers and their adulterated products are identified. That’s why it’s so important for food companies, food distributors, food retailers and federal, state and local authorities to promptly and effectively remove from the marketplace any food known or reasonably certain to cause illness or death.

That’s also why there should be a special place in hell for those companies that knew or should have known a food product was dangerous but continued to sell it anyway.

The ongoing Salmonella outbreak involving Peanut Corporation of America (PCA) is a case in point. It appears from the company’s emails that its officers and employees knowingly shipped adulterated product. If so, the company’s liquidation and the criminal investigation of its principals are both necessary and fair.

But what about the downstream retailers of food products containing adulterated PCA ingredients? Aren’t they just as culpable if they fail to remove contaminated product from their shelves after they knew or should have known of the recall?

This is not an idle musing. Long after the PCA recall was announced and long after the list of adulterated products was known and accessible on a variety of web sites, retailers big and tiny continued to sell these poisonous snacks. I know because I looked.

Many of the recalled products were snack foods with long shelf lives and wide distribution. Many of the retailers who sell them are small outlets with small product stocks and unsophisticated (if any) recall procedures. For many such retailers, there is little economic justification for removing dangerous products and even less risk of public approbation for failing to do so – little consolation for the victims who continue to get sick long after the products should have been removed.

Perversely, the legal system in many states promotes such behavior. So called “pass through statutes” are intended to insulate downstream retailers from lawsuit liability if the upstream producer or manufacturer of the dangerous product is identifiable and solvent. In such cases, the retailer is automatically dismissed from litigation and bears no financial responsibility (dismissals can be avoided if the downstream retailer modified the product or otherwise actively participated in making the product defective).

So what should be done? From the standpoint of efficacy and efficiency, better product traceback and notification systems have to be designed and implemented. However, I have no illusions that any such improvements are really going to rid long lived snacks from the shelves of retailers disinclined to care all that much. What will incentivize such retailers is the threat of criminal sanctions and financial responsibility.

First, create a tight and focused criminal law that makes it a crime to sell a food product that a retailer knows or should know has been recalled. We do it for sales of liquor and cigarettes to minors; there is no reason not to do it for dangerous food products. If criminalizing the behavior is too extreme, create economic penalties by allowing consumers to prove such illegal sales and awarding them attorney fees if they’re successful. Again, there is precedent for such measures in consumer protection statutes on the books in virtually every state.

To promote food safety, everyone up and down the stream of commerce has to act and bear responsibility and should be held accountable for failing to do so.

Labels: , , ,


Three in Spokane Hit by Botulism

A case of foodborne botulism in Spokane, Washington, has prompted one health official to wonder if the bad economy will lead to a spike in the potentially fatal disease.

There are normally only 25-30 cases of foodborne botulism each year in the United States, but the mortality rate is high if not treated immediately and properly. Like the case in Spokane, most of the illnesses stem from improper home canning of low-acid foods such as green beans and asparagus.

The classic symptoms of foodborne botulism include double vision, blurred vision, drooping eyelids, slurred speech, difficulty swallowing, dry mouth, and muscle weakness. These are all symptoms of the muscle paralysis caused by the bacterial toxin.

In the recent case in Spokane, a nurse in there 30s and two children under the age of 10 became infected with botulism after eating improperly canned green beans from a home garden. The Spokane Spokesman-Review newspaper reported that the woman remains on a ventilator but is recovering. The children suffered milder symptoms.

Epidemiologist Dorothy MacEachern of Spokane Regional Health District told the newspaper that she is concerned that hard economic times will lead to a rise in home canning and a subsequent increase in mistakes that will sicken people with botulism. Treatment of the disease frequently involves use of a special antitoxin.

The food safety experts at PritzkerOlsen Attorneys recommend that home canners review the USDA Home Canning Guide and read what the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says about others steps you can take to minimize exposure to the bacteria. PritzkerOlsen is a national leader in foodborne illness litigation and is involved in virtually every major outbreak of food poisoning.

Labels: , , ,


Company Recalls 89,531 pounds of chicken bouillon

A California company has recalled 89,531 pounds of chicken bouillon after customs officials called attention to the fact that it contained processed chicken from another country that did not meet U.S. poultry product inspection standards.

The move was announced by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). The source of the ingredients in the bouillon could not be identified.

The granulated bouillon was distributed by Wei-Chuan USA Inc. of Bell Gardens, Calif. The product had been sold in California, Illinois, New Jersey, Texas and Washington. The FSIS has received no reports of illness in association with the recalled bouillon.

The three products involved in the recall are:
  • 1-pound cans of Wei-Chuan granulated chicken bouillon
  • 2.2-pound cans of Wei-Chuan granulated chicken bouillon
  • 5-pound plastic pouches of Wei-Chuan granulated chicken bouillon.

Labels: , ,


Food Safety Tips for the Holidays


Clean, separate, cook and chill.


Those are the four basic food safety lessons preached to consumers by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration -- especially around the holidays.


The food safety experts at PritzkerOlsen, one of the few law firms in the United States that practices extensively in the area of foodborne illness litigation, couldn't agree more.


What follows is a list of reminders on how to keep harmful bacteria from spoiling your holiday feast:

  • Keep cream pies, cakes with whipped-cream frosting and other creamy deserts well refrigerated.


  • Purchase produce that is not bruised or damaged.


  • Do not cross-contaminate, even in the grocery store. Bag meat, poultry and fish separately from fruits, vegetables and other foods that will be eaten uncooked.


  • Pre-cut or pre-washed produce, such as lettuce, should be rewashed if taken from an open bag in the fridge.


  • Even if produce is peeled first, it is still important to wash it.


  • Your refrigerator temperature should be set at 40 degrees, or lower.


  • Consider using a separate cutting board for raw meats, poultry and seafood.


  • Do not put cooked meat or fish on any unwashed plate that carried raw meat or fish.


  • Keep hands washed before and after handling food. Wash with warm water and soap for 20 seconds each time.


  • Do not rinse raw meat and poultry before cooking because it makes it more likely for bacteria to be spread on kitchen counters.


  • Use a food thermometer to make sure meat, poultry and fish are cooked to a safe internal temperature. For a turkey, that means 165 degrees, and that also goes for stuffing inside the bird.


  • When making your own egg nog, use pasteurized egg products or egg substitutes -- not raw eggs.


  • Do not feed cookie dough containing raw eggs to yourself or children.


  • Don't taste food that looks or smells questionable. When in doubt, throw it out.


  • Don't thaw frozen foods on the kitchen counter. They should be thawed in the refrigerator. If you are in a hurry, thaw under cold running water or in the microwave -- but be sure to cook the food right away.

Labels: , ,


Ohio Firm Recalls Sausage Over Listeria Concern

A company from Youngstown, Ohio, has recalled packages of Sopressata mild sausage after the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service said the product might be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes.

In a press release, the FSIS said late Friday that the product was produced in Canada Oct. 9 and distributed to a lone specialty retailer in Boardman, Ohio. No illnesses had been reported in connection with the finding, which happened in routine test sampling by the FSIS.

DeNiro Cheese of Youngstown said the one-pound packages are stamped with a use-by date of July 9, 2009. The product code is 91009 and the Canadian mark of inspection number is 476A.

When consumed, Listeria monocytogenes can cause Listeriosis, an uncommon but potentially fatal disease in children, the elderly and people who have weakened immune systems. The pathogen also can cause stillbirth or miscarriage in pregnant women.

Our law firm is one of the few in the nation that practices extensively in the area of foodborne illness litigation. We have represented several victims of Listeria outbreaks. Contact us regarding our experience in this area by calling toll-free at 1-888-377-8900.


Labels: , , ,


Melamine Found in Cookies


A Vietnam company has recalled cookies it distributed in the United States after melamine was detected in a sample product tested by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture.

Interfood Shareholding Co. has recalled all lot codes of four varieties of its Wonderfarm brand biscuits sold in 800-gram red tins. The varieties are "Successful,'' "Royal Flavour,'' "Lovely Melody,'' and "Daily Life.''

State testing found that some cookies in the sample batch contained melamine levels that exceeded the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) limit of 2.5 parts per million.

Melamine is a synthetic chemical with a variety of industrial uses. In what was one of the biggest food safety stories of the year, the chemical was added to baby formula in China by unscrupulous manufacturers who wanted to boost protein readings. More than 50,000 children were sickened in the scandal.

After some food imports to the U.S. started to test positive for melamine, the U.S. Department of Agriculture early this month ordered spot checks on certain foods popular with children.

Labels: ,


Is E. coli O157:H7 Becoming More Virulent?

A phylogenetic analysis of E. coli O157:H7 has found that recombination or recurrent mutation has contributed to the evolution of E. coli O157:H7 into more virulent strains. The research was prompted by several recent outbreaks involving E. coli O157:H7 (e.g., 2006 spinach E. coli outbreak) that were “associated with more severe disease, as defined by higher hemolytic uremic syndrome and hospitalization frequencies, suggesting that increased virulence has evolved.”

500 E. coli O157:H7 clinical strains were analyzed and separated into 9 distinct clades:
Differences were observed between clades in the frequency and distribution of Shiga toxin genes and in the type of clinical disease reported. Patients with hemolytic uremic syndrome were significantly more likely to be infected with clade 8 strains, which have increased in frequency over the past 5 years. Genome sequencing of a spinach outbreak strain, a member of clade 8, also revealed substantial genomic differences. These findings suggest that an emergent subpopulation of the clade 8 lineage has acquired critical factors that contribute to more severe disease.
Read the results of this study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

As part of this study, Thomas Whittam, Hannah Distinguished Professor at the National Food Safety and Toxicology Center at Michigan State University and David Alland of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, two co-authors of the study, developed a new technique to test E. coli O157:H7 DNA.

Posted March 2008.

Labels: ,


Sell by Date, Best if Used by Date and Expiration Date

An information government blog, GovGab, provides valuable information on a variety of topics. Today's post defines dates used on food products:
Sell by/pull by date: This is the date that stores pay attention to. If an item hasn't sold by this date, they're supposed to pull it from the shelves. Don't be afraid to buy something on or right before its 'sell by' date; it'll still be good for a while if it's stored properly. How long? That depends on the item. More on that in a minute.

Best if used before/by
: Until this date, your food's guaranteed to be at peak freshness if it's been properly stored. After that date, it'll still be safe to consume for a while but the quality won't be as high. So your OJ won't have that "fresh-squeezed taste" anymore. And if you've ever taken a swig of diet soda after the 'best by' date stamped on the bottle, you're familiar with the unmistakable taste of decomposing artificial sweetener. Yum.

Expiration date
: This is your food's last hurrah. If you haven't consumed it by this date, toss it. It could make you sick if you try eating or drinking it.
The post also provides links to charts:

Labels:


Hallmark/Westland Beef Recall

The USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service has announced the voluntary recall of more than 140 million pounds of raw and frozen beef from the Hallmark/Westland Meat Packing Co. of Chino, California. The recall comes as a response to allegations of Westland inhumanely treating cattle and failing to have cattle inspected thoroughly and correctly.

The allegations stem from over two years of Westland failing to have FSIS public health veterinarians inspect cattle that became non-ambulatory after ante-mortem inspection. This is in direct conflict with the FSIS rule of “Prohibition of the Use of Specified Risk Materials for Human Food and Requirements for the Disposition of Non-Ambulatory Disabled Cattle” which was issued in July 2007.

According to the FSIS recall statement:

Some of the Westland Meat Co. branded products were purchased for Federal food and nutrition programs and, since Jan. 30, 2008, USDA has had an administrative hold on all products from Westland Meat Co. in all of these outlets including, in the National School Lunch Program, the Emergency Food Assistance Program and the Food Assistance Program on Indian Reservations. Based on this Class II recall, officials of the Food and Nutrition Service and Agricultural Marketing Service will work closely with State food and nutrition officials to minimize any disruptions caused by the removal and disposal of recalled Westland Meat Co. products.

Westland shut down operations on February 1 and FSIS issued a Notice of Suspension three days later after investigating the plant after receiving allegations of violations. The practices at Westland directly violated the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act.

According to a Q&A release from the FSIS:

The Hallmark/Westland Meat Packing Company must first respond to the Notice of Suspension and submit a corrective action plan to address its failure to properly implement the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act and FSIS regulations. FSIS must first verify that the plan they submit fully and completely addresses the findings in the Notice of Suspension to ensure the humane handling and slaughter of animals at the facility.

FSIS is continuing to investigate the plant and the company has yet to take any actions to prevent future violations. The USDA has also expressed intent to reimburse state governments for Westland products received from federal food programs. The USDA is also ending contractual agreements with Westland and will be looking to replace all products that are removed from the food supply. Any of the recalled Westland products must be destroyed according to government guidelines.

Concern over the recalled beef products centers around risks of spreading Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) into the nation’s food supply. However, according to FSIS, the risk of BSE in the Westland meat is:

Negligible. The federal government has an interlocking system of controls to protect the food supply and to prevent animals with signs of central nervous system disorders from entering the food chain. All cattle at the Hallmark/Westland Meat Packing Company passed ante-mortem inspection before slaughter.
FSIS also maintains that the health risk is negligible to children who may have consumed Westland products through the School Lunch Program. Westland products were also distributed to African nations such as the Ivory Coast and Angola. The USDA does not believe international trade will be affected due to strict standards that are more thorough than those advised by the World Organization for Animal Health.

A list of specific products being recalled can be found at: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/PDF/Recall_005-2008_Release.pdf

Contact information about which schools received Westland products can be found at:
http://www.usda.gov/actions

Labels: ,


It has long been thought proficient hand-washing in hospitals was the most important aspect to controlling the spread of infection. It is also common practice for doctors and nurses in a hurry to use alcohol-based hand gels rather than conventional soap and water. Dr. Mark Rupp at the University of Nebraska Medical Center put these practices to the test.

Rupp observed hygiene practices in two intensive care units over two years to compile his data. According to The New York Times,

More gel dispensers were put in the units, and usage rose from 37 percent to 68 percent in one unit and from 38 percent to 69 percent in the other. Compliance for hand washing of any kind in most hospitals is estimated to be about 40 percent, according to experts, although some hospitals do better.

Bacteria samples taken every two months showed that health workers’ hands were cleaner when using the hand gel. However, the rates of infections in the ICUs did not show any clear relationship with the rate of hand gel usage. One unit also showed an increase in infections.

Rupp stated that better hand washing does not play a large enough role to cut down on infection. He said, “Hand hygiene is still important, but it’s not a panacea.” Rupp suggest other ways to help cut down on infection, including a better cleaning of hospital units, proper insertion and maintenance of catheters, and having doctors only prescribe antibiotics when necessary. He also called for hospital workers to cease wearing rings and to trim fingernails shorter than CDC recommendations (quarter of an inch).

Labels: , ,


Salmonella Prevention: FSIS Initiates New Procedures

In a recent press release from the USDA’ Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), new procedures and sampling techniques are being compiled into data in order to decrease the growing prevalence of Salmonella in our nation’s beef and poultry supply. According to a CDC report in 2006, Salmonella accounted for 38.6% of human foodborne illnesses, the greatest of all such pathogens. FSIS also launched their new protocol to deal with Salmonella in 2006. The initiative grouped production establishments into categories based on their rates of Salmonella with current regulations.

The categories for establishments are as follows, as stated in the report:

Category 2 establishments are those with sample set results above half but not exceeding the current standard for one or both of their most recent sample sets and Category 3 are those that are exceeding the current standards. Category 1 establishments have the lowest Salmonella rates of the three categories with sample set results at or below half of the current standards.
All the collected data from the establishments will be posted on the FSIS web site on March 28, 2008. The new compilation of data will shed more light on data already analyzed which shows differences in the third quarter of 2007 with the first quarter.

Eighty-four percent of turkey slaughter establishments are now Category 1, the other 16 percent are in Category 2. These numbers represent significant improvement from the first quarter of 2007 where 53 percent of establishments were in Category 1, 38 percent in Category 2 and three percent at Category 3. For broilers, the percentage of establishments in Category 1 is 73 percent and the percentage of establishments in Category 2 is 23 percent. This figure is up by ten percent from the first quarter of 2007. This is compared with only 35.5 percent of broiler establishments performing in Category 1 after the first quarter of 2006.

New technology such as new equipment, procedures, and processing techniques are also being tested at Category 1 establishments to measure their effectiveness at combating the presence of Salmonella. The partaking establishments take samples during every shift to be sent to FSIS for analysis.

Along with all of the data being collected and analyzed, FSIS has reexamined how to deal with smaller ground beef establishments that produce very little of the beef supply. Rather than taking the majority of test samples from these establishments, more samples are being taken from the larger establishments, while random testing of the smaller establishments continues. FSIS is also looking into sub-groups of establishments, such as ratite or religious-exempt establishments, to make sure that all possible sub-groups are documented and tested so that it can be clearer where contamination is coming from. All data is being compared to data on the CDC’s PulseNet so that the FSIS can have a clearer picture of which facilities are producing products that lead to foodborne illness.

Labels: , , , ,


Current Policies and Procedures of the U.S. Food System

Analysts from the Heritage Foundation have studied the current policies and procedures of the food system of the United States, outlining problems with current practices and with reform ideas from the government. The major issues concerning food safety revolve around the regulation of imported products into the U.S. and the way government agencies interact to promote safer food.

In the current system the regulation of food is split between the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) of the Department of Agriculture, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency of the Department of Homeland security. FSIS regulates meat, poultry and egg products, FDA regulates everything else, and CBP regulates imports into the country.

Although FSIS regulates a smaller percentage of the nation’s food supply than the FDA, FSIS receives more government funding and handles food safety much differently than the FDA. FSIS creates a list of countries (currently 34) that comply with U.S. safety standards and allows the import of products from firms who are certified by their home nation’s government. The CBP then verifies shipping records when products reach U.S. borders. Once on U.S. soil, FSIS inspects the products in 33 different ports among 135 inspection centers, using a computer system to record vital information. All products must be visually inspected by FSIS officials, while a computer system randomly generates a variety of products to also undergo laboratory testing.

The FDA, on the other hand, utilizes a completely different system. The FDA inspects each foreign firm in order to certify safe producers. This is a difficult task so the agency notes which importing firms are a high or low risk, and does on-site testing on that basis. The FDA can also communicate with the CBP computer systems, while FSIS cannot, to see if the shipments reaching the ports are verified. Because of the lack of funding, the FDA is understaffed and inspections occur far less frequently than FSIS inspections.

Washington has noted the flaws in the procedures of the FDA and FSIS, and has attempted to pass a new strategy to control the safety of our nation’s imported food products. The strategy implements aspects of both systems, calling for more interagency cooperation and for the formation of a single agency to regulate the entire food supply. The reform also includes the certification of countries to import products into America, utilizing import fees and restricting the number of ports available to import products.

The Heritage Foundation, however, sees flaws in the government’s attempt to reform the current system. Rather than imposing penalties on other countries to import food and increasing a government hold on the system, the Heritage Foundation promotes a free market solution to the problem. With simplified government regulations and expanded research into food safety from a scientific standpoint, market forces will promote a safer food supply. Rather than losing money due to bad publicity, companies will voluntarily remove unsafe products from store shelves and competitive forces in the market will favor safer foods. But the Foundation also sees the need for government agencies to have the power to impose mandatory recalls for companies who handle their products irresponsibly.

We respectfully disagree with the Heritage Foundation with regards to a free market solution. This is basically the current federal policy of industry self regulation. As evidenced by the numerous recalls and foodborne outbreaks, this is a failed policy. We do agree that the federal government needs to have the power to impose mandatory recalls on food and other dangerous products.

Labels: , , , ,


Diacetyl in Cooking Oil Can Cause Bronchiolitis Obliterans

UNITE HERE, the largest union for hotel, kitchen, and restaurant workers in North America, has demanded cooking oil manufacturers to stop using the harmful chemical diacetyl, according to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Diacetyl is a butter-flavor additive which is often found in cooking oils, sprays, and margarine which can be harmful if released as a vapor when heated.

At least three deaths have been attributed to diacetyl from the formation of bronchiolitis obliterans in the victims. Bronchiolitis obliterans is inflammation in the smaller pathways in the lungs. The highest levels of diacetyl are found in cooking oils used by professional chefs.

Congress is concerned about the prevalence of the chemical and has sent a letter to the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. The letter stated that “it is urgent that we finally determine the national scope of exposure and illness related to diacetyl-containing food flavoring.”

The FDA cannot take action because, according to the FDA, diacetyl is only harmful when released as a vapor, not when ingested as a food. Therefore, it is the responsibility of OSHA to deal with laws concerning the workplace safety in regards to diacetyl levels. OSHA, however, has been very slow to respond to the growing concern of the chemical and has implemented no new rules to protect workers from potential lung disease.

While scientists and experts are working to figure out the exact effects of diacetyl and at what levels it is most dangerous, states such as California and Washington are already taking action. The two states are working together to develop regulations regarding the use of the chemical and are working on a letter to send to all professional chefs and restaurants to warn of the dangers of diacetyl. Because of the increased publicity of its harmful effects, many companies are already producing diacetyl-free products.

Labels: ,


Food Safety During an Emergency

A list of recommendations for preventing foodborne illnesses has been released by the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) in response to severe winter weather and flooding in the western United States.

"Power outages can occur at any time of the year and it often takes from a few hours to several days for electricity to be restored to residential areas," said USDA Under Secretary for Food Safety Dr. Richard Raymond. Bacteria can grow rapidly at temperatures between 40° and 140°F. Foods can be at risk when power goes out for extended periods of time.

FSIS has released the following steps to prepare for a weather emergency:
  • Keep an appliance thermometer in the refrigerator and freezer. An appliance thermometer will indicate the temperature in the refrigerator and freezer in case of a power outage and help determine the safety of the food.
  • Make sure the freezer is at 0 °F or below and the refrigerator is at 40 °F or below.
  • Freeze containers of water for ice to help keep food cold in the freezer, refrigerator or coolers after the power is out.
  • Freeze refrigerated items such as leftovers, milk and fresh meat and poultry that you may not need immediately — this helps keep them at a safe temperature longer.
  • Plan ahead and know where dry ice and block ice can be purchased.
  • Store food on shelves that will be safely out of the way of contaminated water in case of flooding.
  • Have coolers on hand to keep refrigerator food cold if the power will be out for more than 4 hours. Purchase or make ice cubes and store in the freezer for use in the refrigerator or in a cooler. Freeze gel packs ahead of time for use in coolers.
  • Group food together in the freezer — this helps the food stay cold longer.
The following steps are to be taken after a weather emergency:
  • Keep the refrigerator and freezer doors closed as much as possible to maintain the cold temperature.
  • The refrigerator will keep food safely cold for about 4 hours if it is unopened. A full freezer will hold the temperature for approximately 48 hours (24 hours if it is half full) and the door remains closed.
  • Discard refrigerated perishable food such as meat, poultry, fish, soft cheeses, milk, eggs, leftovers and deli items after 4 hours without power.
  • Food may be safely refrozen if it still contains ice crystals or is at 40 °F or below when checked with a food thermometer.
  • Never taste a food to determine its safety!
  • Obtain dry or block ice to keep your refrigerator and freezer as cold as possible if the power is going to be out for a prolonged period of time. Fifty pounds of dry ice should hold an 18-cubic-foot full freezer for 2 days.

Labels: , ,


Food Poisoning Lawyer Fred Pritzker has appeared on national television and has been quoted by national publications, including The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Associated Press and Lawyers USA. He has been named a "Super Lawyer" by Law and Politics magazine. He is also listed in the current edition of The Best Lawyers in America. To contact Fred Pritzker about a food poisoning lawsuit or food safety advocacy, please call 1-888-377-8900 (toll free) or submit the firm's free consultation form.

Free Case Consultation





Logos
Fred Pritzker on Comcast Newsmakers

Fred Pritzker on Twitter

Fred Pritzker is listed in The Best Lawyers in America

 
 

This is attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The result of each case is determined by the specific facts and the applicable law.