What We Do
Foodborne Illness
Previous Posts
- Salami Recall Lawsuit
- HAPPYTOT Baby Food Recall
- Parkers Farm Recall Lawsuit
- Adams Farm Slaughterhouse Beef Recall
- Report Links Milan IL McDonalds to Hepatitis A Out...
- Fairbury Steaks Ground Beef Recall
- South Shore Meats Recall
- MN Petting Zoo E coli HUS Linked to Llama
- Texas Star Meat Beef Brisket Recall
- Culebra Meat Market Beef Recall
Archives
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- July 2008
- September 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
Pritzker Olsen Law Firm Food Safety Blog
Pritzker Olsen attorneys have appeared on CBS News, Fox news, and numerous local television stations throughout the country. They have recovered millions for victims of food poisoning outbreaks. To contact our law firm, please call 1-888-377-8900 (toll free) or submit our free consultation form.
Listeria Salmon Recalled
The FDA said no there have been no confirmed illnesses "to date.''
The recall notice, published in conjunction with the FDA, said the salmon is in vacuum packed 3 oz, 8 oz, 16 oz, and whole side “to be weighed at time of sale” sizes of lots starting with # 142 xxxx. The notice did not specify the volume of product subject to recall.
The product is packed sliced or whole sides on aluminum coated cardboard in a clear plastic vacuum packed bag with a red, black, and gold sticker label with gold lettering and a small white sticker label identifying the lot code. The first three digits are the Lot Code followed by a four digit “packaging” date. The firm is recalling all lots that begin with code 142 (for example: 142
0525, 142 0526, 142 0527, 142 0528).Listeria monocytogenes is a potentially deadly bacterium that is known to cause still birth and miscarriage in pregnant women. Healthy adults usually recover without medical attention, but the pathogen is a dangerous health threat to young children, the elderly and people with weakened immune systems. Symptoms are flu-like muscle aches and fever, sometimes coupled with nausea and diarrhea. An infection can bring on stiff neck, headache, loss of balance, confusion or convulsions.
If you or someone you know has been diagnosed with Listeriosis, contact a Listeria attorney at PritzkerOlsen, P.A. The firm is involved in practically every major outbreak of foodborne illness and has collected millions for victims of all types of food poisoning. On behalf of millions of victims of food poisoning, PritzkerOlsen has been a steadfast critic of ineffective food safety laws and one of its clients recently testified before a Congressional panel about the personal loss that accompanies lethal cases of contamination.
To contact a food poisoning lawyer at PritzkerOlsen, call 1-888-377-8900 (Toll Free), or complete one of our online forms for a free case consultation.
Labels: Listeria salmon lawsuit, Listeria Salmon recall, New York Fish recall
Current Policies and Procedures of the U.S. Food System
In the current system the regulation of food is split between the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) of the Department of Agriculture, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency of the Department of Homeland security. FSIS regulates meat, poultry and egg products, FDA regulates everything else, and CBP regulates imports into the country.
Although FSIS regulates a smaller percentage of the nation’s food supply than the FDA, FSIS receives more government funding and handles food safety much differently than the FDA. FSIS creates a list of countries (currently 34) that comply with U.S. safety standards and allows the import of products from firms who are certified by their home nation’s government. The CBP then verifies shipping records when products reach U.S. borders. Once on U.S. soil, FSIS inspects the products in 33 different ports among 135 inspection centers, using a computer system to record vital information. All products must be visually inspected by FSIS officials, while a computer system randomly generates a variety of products to also undergo laboratory testing.
The FDA, on the other hand, utilizes a completely different system. The FDA inspects each foreign firm in order to certify safe producers. This is a difficult task so the agency notes which importing firms are a high or low risk, and does on-site testing on that basis. The FDA can also communicate with the CBP computer systems, while FSIS cannot, to see if the shipments reaching the ports are verified. Because of the lack of funding, the FDA is understaffed and inspections occur far less frequently than FSIS inspections.
Washington has noted the flaws in the procedures of the FDA and FSIS, and has attempted to pass a new strategy to control the safety of our nation’s imported food products. The strategy implements aspects of both systems, calling for more interagency cooperation and for the formation of a single agency to regulate the entire food supply. The reform also includes the certification of countries to import products into America, utilizing import fees and restricting the number of ports available to import products.
The Heritage Foundation, however, sees flaws in the government’s attempt to reform the current system. Rather than imposing penalties on other countries to import food and increasing a government hold on the system, the Heritage Foundation promotes a free market solution to the problem. With simplified government regulations and expanded research into food safety from a scientific standpoint, market forces will promote a safer food supply. Rather than losing money due to bad publicity, companies will voluntarily remove unsafe products from store shelves and competitive forces in the market will favor safer foods. But the Foundation also sees the need for government agencies to have the power to impose mandatory recalls for companies who handle their products irresponsibly.
We respectfully disagree with the Heritage Foundation with regards to a free market solution. This is basically the current federal policy of industry self regulation. As evidenced by the numerous recalls and foodborne outbreaks, this is a failed policy. We do agree that the federal government needs to have the power to impose mandatory recalls on food and other dangerous products.
Labels: FDA, food imports, food regulation, food safety, FSIS
Food Poisoning Lawyer Fred Pritzker has appeared on national television and has been quoted by national publications, including The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Associated Press and Lawyers USA. He has been named a "Super Lawyer" by Law and Politics magazine. He is also listed in the current edition of The Best Lawyers in America. To contact Fred Pritzker about a food poisoning lawsuit or food safety advocacy, please call 1-888-377-8900 (toll free) or submit the firm's free consultation form.
Free Case Consultation
Fred Pritzker on Twitter
- Tassimo Coffee Maker Recalled after 37 People Get 2nd Degree Burns http://t.co/tZbWX7OW
- Raw milk outbreak sickens 51 http://t.co/Oxy3G6Bj
- Chicago Department of Public Health showing power to all fields: http://t.co/FSRcJG9G
- Interesting Science Daily story about raw milk http://t.co/MNsGFSAQ
- Washington Statewide Cheerleading Competition Spawns Outbreak of Food Poisoning: http://t.co/VgOUf0e3
- DePuy ASR Hip Lawsuit: Minnesota Attorney for Cobalt and Chromium Damage http://t.co/3AwAkxWN
- DePuy ASR Hip Lawsuit: South Dakota Patients Claim Cobalt and Chromium Poisoning http://t.co/tQVCKVm4
- DePuy Hip Lawsuit in North Dakota Can Be Part of Federal Proceeding to Expedite Settlement http://t.co/mtgWdzoA
Fred Pritzker is listed in The Best Lawyers in America
This is attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The result of each case is determined by the specific facts and the applicable law.

