What We Do
Foodborne Illness
Previous Posts
- Recall: Ground Beef With Metal Clips
- Bean and Soy Sprouts Recalled Over Listeria
- Food Safety Lawyer Says Wrongdoers Should Be Held ...
- E coli Outbreak in Cleveland, Ohio
- 48 Tons of Ground Beef Recalled
- Lettuce, E. coli and HUS
- Renal Failure and E. coli Testing
- Lettuce E. coli Science Projects
- Cantaloupe Recall: Wal-Mart Stores
- Salmonella Outbreak - Pepper: Law Firm Representin...
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
Pritzker Olsen Law Firm Food Safety Blog
Pritzker Olsen attorneys have appeared on CBS News, Fox news, and numerous local television stations throughout the country. They have recovered millions for victims of food poisoning outbreaks. To contact our law firm, please call 1-888-377-8900 (toll free) or submit our free consultation form.
What We Dont Know Will Hurt Us
The Federal government’s Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) recently released preliminary data about the frequency of certain foodborne illnesses in 10 monitoring states for the year 2008. This is the equivalent of the government’s report card for food safety. The scores, as they say, leave much room for improvement.
The “take away” point from this data is that “progress toward the national health objectives [for foodborne pathogens] has plateaued, suggesting that fundamental problems with bacterial and parasitic contamination are not being resolved.”
My comment [and their goal] is simply: “No Shit.”
Stripped of its “journal speak,” the data shows that after making progress for a few years, efforts to safeguard our food have gone nowhere.
"The lack of recent progress toward the national health objective targets and the occurrence of large multistate outbreaks points to gaps in the current food safety system and the need to continue to develop and evaluate food safety practices as food moves from the farm to the table."
A closer reading of the data actually points to more serious problems. For example, in just one year (from 2007 to 2008), test samples of ground beef yielding E. coli O157:H7 nearly doubled from 0.24% to 0.47%. This is really quite shocking.
It was also interesting to note that only 25.7% of E. coli O157:H7 infections and 7.4% of Salmonella cases are associated with outbreaks. In other words, in the vast majority of human illness associated with these two pathogens, the source is never identified.
In a way, this is even more shocking. It shows we’re still very inadequate when it comes to testing for and analyzing foodborne pathogens – in other words, what we don’t know will hurt us.
Labels: campylobacter lawsuit, clostridium botulinum,food poisoning lawyer, salmonella attorney
Food Poisoning Lawyer Fred Pritzker has appeared on national television and has been quoted by national publications, including The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Associated Press and Lawyers USA. He has been named a "Super Lawyer" by Law and Politics magazine. He is also listed in the current edition of The Best Lawyers in America. To contact Fred Pritzker about a food poisoning lawsuit or food safety advocacy, please call 1-888-377-8900 (toll free) or submit the firm's free consultation form.
Free Case Consultation
Fred Pritzker on Twitter
- Tassimo Coffee Maker Recalled after 37 People Get 2nd Degree Burns http://t.co/tZbWX7OW
- Raw milk outbreak sickens 51 http://t.co/Oxy3G6Bj
- Chicago Department of Public Health showing power to all fields: http://t.co/FSRcJG9G
- Interesting Science Daily story about raw milk http://t.co/MNsGFSAQ
- Washington Statewide Cheerleading Competition Spawns Outbreak of Food Poisoning: http://t.co/VgOUf0e3
- DePuy ASR Hip Lawsuit: Minnesota Attorney for Cobalt and Chromium Damage http://t.co/3AwAkxWN
- DePuy ASR Hip Lawsuit: South Dakota Patients Claim Cobalt and Chromium Poisoning http://t.co/tQVCKVm4
- DePuy Hip Lawsuit in North Dakota Can Be Part of Federal Proceeding to Expedite Settlement http://t.co/mtgWdzoA
Fred Pritzker is listed in The Best Lawyers in America
This is attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The result of each case is determined by the specific facts and the applicable law.

