Practice Areas
- Defective Products
- Product Liability Law
- CPSC Recalls
- Defective Product Recalls
- Defective Medical Products
- Toxic Substances
- Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
- Diacetyl
- Asbestos
- Lead Poisoning
- News & Topics
- Defective Medical Archives
Other Practice Areas
- E coli Poisoning
- Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS)
- Campylobacter
- Clostridium Perfringens
- Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS)
- Hepatitis A Food Poisoning
- Listeria Poisoning
- Listeriosis
- Salmonella Lawyer
- Shigella
- Amputation
- Burn Attorney
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Wrongful Death
- Car Accident Attorney MN
- Foodborne Illness
- Medical Malpractice
- Medical Products
- MN Accident Attorney
- Minnesota Dog Bite Attorney
- Minnesota Injury Lawyer
- Semi Truck Accident Lawyer MN
- Child Safety Lawyers
Personal Injury and Wrongful Death
Dollar Store KI Pacifier Recall
Pacifier Recall: “Baby 2 Pack” Pacifiers Recalled for Choking Hazard
May 25, 2006 – The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and Kole Imports of Carson, California (KI) announced the recall of about 3,600 packages of “Baby 2 Pack” pacifiers. The pacifier’s nipple can easily detach from the guard, posing a serious choking hazard to young children.
The description of the recalled pacifiers from the CPSC announcement is as follows:
The recalled pacifiers are rubber nipples attached to a white or light blue plastic guard. The cardboard packaging has a picture of a baby, some toy blocks, a toy train engine and a diaper pin with a bear on it. The pacifiers are sold in packs of two. Writing on the front of the packaging includes, “Baby,” “2 pack Pacifiers” and “BI194.” The back of the packaging has an American flag and the writing, “AN AMERICAN COMPANY.”
The recalled pacifiers were sold at discount dollar stores nationwide from August 2005 through March 2006 for about $1.
KI Baby Pacifier Recall: Lawyer and Free Consultation
If your child has choked on a baby pacifier, a lawyer at Pritzker | Olsen, P.A. is available for a free consultation. You can reach us by calling toll-free at 1-888-377-8900 or by filling out our online consultation form.
Our senior partner, Fred Pritzker, has over 29 years of lawsuit experience and is currently lead attorney in a major product liability lawsuit involving victims from several states. In recognition of his achievements, other lawyers have selected him for inclusion in the 2005-2006 edition of The Best Lawyers in America.
Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission May 25, 2006, recall announcement
(http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml06/06170.html)
Free Case Consultation
Firm News
Yamaha Rhino Lawsuit
NBC affiliate KSBY interviewed Fred Pritzker regarding Yamaha Rhino rollovers. There has not been a Yamaha Rhino recall.
Fred Pritzker Listed in The Best Lawyers in America
Fred Pritzker has been notified that he will again be listed in The Best Lawyers in America for his work in personal injury and wrongful death litigation.
Traumatic Brain Injury
Attorneys Fred Pritzker and Elliot Olsen spoke at the annual Minnesota Association for Justice Brain Injury Seminar. They represent brain injury survivors in product liability cases throughout the nation.
Medtronic Recall and Medtronic Lawsuit
FDA has annonced a Medtronic Spring Fidelis defibrillator lead recall. Two of our clients with defective Medtronic leads were shocked over twenty times before medical professionals were able to turn off the defibrillator.
Ortho Evra Lawsuit: Ortho Evra Birth Control Patch
The Ortho Evra birth control patch has been linked to an increased risk of blood clots that can lead to pulmonary embolism, stroke and heart attack.
Trasylol Recall
Bayer has agreed to a marketing suspension of Trasylol, a drug used to control bleeding during heart surgery, pending detailed review of preliminary results from a Canadian study that suggested an increased risk for death.
Fentanyl Lawsuit and Fentanyl Recall
There have been a number of recalls regarding fentanyl due to the risk of a fentanyl overdose.
This is attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The result of each case is determined by the specific facts and the applicable law.

