Personal Injury and Wrongful Death

Hip Replacement Lawsuit:
Lawyer for DePuy Lawsuit and Investigation

In the video below product liability attorney Fred Pritzker discusses the Depuy hip replacement recall and a Johnson & Johnson (J & J) and DePuy lawsuit for injuries that incude revision surgery and chromium poisoning.

DePuy Hip Replacement Lawsuit Hearing

A process similar to a DePuy class action lawsuit was approved by a federal court.  The process is called multidistrict litigation (MDL), and it consolidates the pre-trial processes for all DePuy lawsuits and gives jurisdiction for all cases to one federal court:

On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing session held, we find that seven of these eight actions involve common questions of fact, and that centralization under Section 1407 in the Northern District of Ohio will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation. The actions share factual issues as to whether DePuy’s ASR XL Acetabular Hip System, a device used in hip replacement surgery, was defectively designed and/or manufactured, and whether DePuy failed to provide adequate warnings concerning the device, which DePuy recalled along with another ASR device, the ASR Hip Resurfacing System, in August 2010. Centralization under Section 1407 will eliminate duplicative discovery, prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings on discovery and other issues, and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel and the judiciary. (Read the full MDL order.)

Contact our law firm to be part of the MDL. The lead attorneys for our DePuy lawsuits are Fred Pritzker and David Szerlag.

Our lawyers have recovered over 20 million dollars for people injured by defective medical products and the families of people whose deaths were associated with defective products. To contact Pritzker Olsen law firm, please call 1-888-377-8900 (toll free) or submit our online form for a free consultation. You will not have to pay any up-front fees, and we are not paid unless you win.

Compensation for Victims
of Dangerous and Defective Medical Products

A medical device is defective if there is a design defect, a manufacturing defect (often too much of an active ingredient) or the labeling and any other warnings are insufficient to warn of risks. The law states that manufacturers must alert consumers to the possible problems and side effects their medical products can cause.

Thousands of people receive injuries from unsafe medical products each year. Those injuries deserve compensation, which can include the following:

  • Economic damages. Compensation for monetary losses such as past and future medical expenses, loss of past and future earnings, loss of employment or business opportunities.
  • Non-economic damages. Compensation for subjective, non-monetary losses such as pain, suffering, inconvenience, emotional distress, loss of society and companionship, loss of consortium, and loss of enjoyment of life.
  • Punitive damages. Damages awarded for the purpose of punishing a party for intentional or reckless behavior or actions motivated by malice.

Keywords: Depuy hip replacement lawsuit, hip implant class action lawsuit, Alabama AL, Arkansas AK, California CA, Colorado CO, Connecticut CT, Delaware DE, District of Columbia DC, Florida FL, Georgia GA, Idaho ID, Illinois IL, Indiana IN, Iowa, Kansas KS, Kentucky KY, Louisiana LA, Maine ME, Maryland MD, Massachusetts MA, Michigan MI, attorney Lawyer for DePuy Lawsuit Minneapolis, Minnesota MN, Mississippi MS.

Missouri MO, Montana MT, Nebraska NE, Nevada NV, New Hampshire NH, New Jersey NJ, New York NY, North Carolina NC, North Dakota ND, Ohio OH, Oklahoma OK, Pennsylvania PA, Rhode Island RI, South Carolina SC, South Dakota SD, Tennessee TN, Texas TX, Vermont VT, Virginia VA, West Virginia WV, Wisconsin WI, and Wyoming WY.

 

 


Free Case Consultation





Logos

We are Not Paid Unless You Win

Our attorneys work on a continguency fee basis, meaning you do not have to pay our law firm for representing you unless we win you money.

 

Firm News

AV Preeminent Rating by Martindale-Hubbell

AV Rated Personal Injury Attorney

Attorneys Fred Pritzker and Eric Hageman have been given the highest rating by Martindale-Hubbell for attorney, AV Preeminent. An AV® certification mark is a significant rating accomplishment - a testament to the fact that a lawyer's peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence.

 

Adjunct Teaching Position At U of M Law School

University LogoAttorney Brendan Flaherty has accepted an adjunct teaching position at the University of Minnesota Law School. For the 2011 spring semester, Flaherty will teach a course entitled "Practice and Professionalism," which will introduce students to foundational lawyering skills and professional responsibility issues.

 

Attorney Elliot Olsen Speaks at Conference

Attorney Elliot Olsen recently spoke at the Seventh Annual LifeScience Alley Conference in Minneapolis on Preemption and the Future of Medical Device Litigation.  He appeared with Randall Pattee of Lindquist and Vennum and Jean Lance, VP of corporate legal and general counsel for Boston Scientific. 

 

Named Super Lawyer

Super LawyerIn recognition of their achievements, Attorneys Fred Pritzker, Elliot Olsen and Eric Hageman were named "Super Lawyers" by Law & Politics magazine. According to Super Lawyers, "The objective is to create a credible, comprehensive and diverse listing of outstanding attorneys that can be used as a resource to assist attorneys and consumers in the search for legal counsel."

 

Brendan Flaherty Named a Rising Star

In recognition of his achievements, Attorney Brendan Flaherty was named a 2010 Rising Star by Minnesota Law & Politics. Only 2.5 percent of the state’s lawyers are included on the list, which highlights Minnesota’s best up-and-coming legal talent.

 

Fred Pritzker Listed in The Best Lawyers in America

Fred Pritzker has been notified that he will again be listed in The Best Lawyers in America for his work in personal injury litigation.

 

This is attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The result of each case is determined by the specific facts and the applicable law.